From: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <B.Zolnierkiewicz@elka.pw.edu.pl>
To: Mikael Pettersson <mikpe@csd.uu.se>, axboe@suse.de
Cc: alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: DMA for ide-scsi?
Date: Sat, 13 Sep 2003 18:25:27 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <200309131825.27402.bzolnier@elka.pw.edu.pl> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200309131101.h8DB1WNd021570@harpo.it.uu.se>
On Saturday 13 of September 2003 13:01, Mikael Pettersson wrote:
> On Sat, 13 Sep 2003 08:29:18 +0200, Jens Axboe <axboe@suse.de> wrote:
> >> Actually with 2.6, you no longer need ide-scsi. You'll need to upgrade
> >> your cdrecord tools and probably your burning GUI, if you use one. I've
> >> been burning that way for several months now. (I'm using xcdroast,
> >> though I need to start it with "-n" since I'm using cdrecord 2.01a18.)
> >> This actually works better for me than ide-scsi as for some reason it
> >> uses less CPU.
> >
> >That's because it _is_ faster. It contains no silly memory allocations
> >for the buffer and data copying in the kernel, the data is mapped from
> >the user buffer and DMA'ed directly from there. It also uses DMA where
> >ide-scsi wont.
>
> That begs the question: why won't ide-scsi do DMA?
> I understand you'd rather see it disappear (:->) but since I use
> it for other ATAPI devices as well, I'd like to see it maintained
> and fully operational. Having DMA in ide-scsi would be nice.
ide-scsi maintainer position is available :-).
> (And the concept of using a SCSI API to ATA devices is in itself
> not broken, even if the implementation has some problems.)
It is not broken short-term, however it is broken long-term.
> /Mikael
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2003-09-13 16:23 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2003-09-13 11:01 Mikael Pettersson
2003-09-13 16:25 ` Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz [this message]
2003-09-13 18:04 ` Alan Cox
2003-09-13 18:49 ` 2.7 block ramblings (was Re: DMA for ide-scsi?) Jeff Garzik
2003-09-13 19:01 ` Jeff Garzik
2003-09-13 19:06 ` Jeff Garzik
2003-09-15 7:34 ` Jens Axboe
2003-09-16 19:49 ` Jeff Garzik
2003-09-16 19:55 ` Jens Axboe
2003-09-20 18:28 ` Jeff Garzik
2003-09-20 22:16 ` Alan Cox
2003-09-20 22:22 ` Jeff Garzik
2003-09-20 22:46 ` Alan Cox
2003-09-21 9:23 ` Jens Axboe
2003-09-13 19:24 ` Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2003-09-13 19:57 ` Jeff Garzik
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=200309131825.27402.bzolnier@elka.pw.edu.pl \
--to=b.zolnierkiewicz@elka.pw.edu.pl \
--cc=alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk \
--cc=axboe@suse.de \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mikpe@csd.uu.se \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®