mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Adrian Bunk <bunk@fs.tum.de>
To: Jeff Garzik <jgarzik@pobox.com>
Cc: Dave Jones <davej@redhat.com>, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: RFC: [2.6 patch] better i386 CPU selection
Date: Sun, 14 Sep 2003 00:07:06 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20030913220706.GM27368@fs.tum.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20030913185319.GC10047@gtf.org>

On Sat, Sep 13, 2003 at 02:53:19PM -0400, Jeff Garzik wrote:
> > 
> > Echo 2 lines above. People do use 386 kernels for install kernels
> > on distros. Removing errata workarounds means distros start randomly
> > exploding during installs.
> 
> You're not understanding the model.  I understand your comment about
> using 386 kernels for install kernels.  If Adrian's patch is done
> right, _absolutely nothing should change_ in your described scenario.
> 
> Distros would continue doing what they've always done, and would
> continue to get the behavior they have always gotten.
>...

I'm not sure whether you understand my intention.

Nothing will change, except that if you want to support all CPUs, you 
have to select all CPUs instead of 386.

My main intention is to get a clear user interface (user = person 
compiling the kernel) that suits everyone's needs and to put all the 
logic what to do when you plan to support several different CPUs into 
the kernel.

I don't like the current user interface that says "if you want to 
support both an Athlon and a Pentium 4 in your kernel use the Pentium III
option. And for better optimization, also check the "generic" option".

> 	Jeff

cu
Adrian

-- 

       "Is there not promise of rain?" Ling Tan asked suddenly out
        of the darkness. There had been need of rain for many days.
       "Only a promise," Lao Er said.
                                       Pearl S. Buck - Dragon Seed


  parent reply	other threads:[~2003-09-13 22:07 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 68+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2003-09-13 12:51 Adrian Bunk
2003-09-13 14:20 ` Kevin P. Fleming
2003-09-13 17:10   ` Adrian Bunk
2003-09-13 16:11 ` Dave Jones
2003-09-13 16:41   ` Adrian Bunk
2003-09-13 17:21     ` Dave Jones
2003-09-13 18:22       ` Adrian Bunk
2003-09-13 18:35         ` Dave Jones
2003-09-13 21:52           ` Adrian Bunk
2003-09-13 18:21   ` Jeff Garzik
2003-09-13 18:37     ` Dave Jones
2003-09-13 18:53       ` Jeff Garzik
2003-09-13 20:32         ` Alan Cox
2003-09-13 22:07         ` Adrian Bunk [this message]
2003-09-13 22:33           ` Jeff Garzik
2003-09-13 18:47     ` Alan Cox
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2003-09-14  8:55 John Bradford
2003-09-14  8:52 John Bradford
     [not found] <viay.6qh.11@gated-at.bofh.it>
     [not found] ` <vli4.2Ml.15@gated-at.bofh.it>
     [not found]   ` <vnjR.5Sn.5@gated-at.bofh.it>
     [not found]     ` <vnD7.6jK.1@gated-at.bofh.it>
     [not found]       ` <vnMX.6x0.17@gated-at.bofh.it>
     [not found]         ` <vqKS.2NP.29@gated-at.bofh.it>
2003-09-14  0:07           ` Andi Kleen
2003-09-14  0:10             ` David Lang
2003-09-13 11:04 Mikael Pettersson
2003-09-13 11:02 Mikael Pettersson
2003-09-13 11:13 ` Adrian Bunk
2003-09-12 21:38 Mikael Pettersson
2003-09-12 23:23 ` Adrian Bunk
2003-09-16 12:42 ` Maciej W. Rozycki
2003-09-12 20:09 Mikael Pettersson
2003-09-12 22:51 ` Adrian Bunk
2003-09-07 21:47 Mikael Pettersson
2003-09-07 21:46 Mikael Pettersson
2003-09-07 21:56 ` Adrian Bunk
2003-09-07 16:47 Mikael Pettersson
2003-09-07 17:43 ` Jamie Lokier
2003-09-07 18:09   ` Alan Cox
2003-09-08  8:17     ` Rogier Wolff
2003-09-08 12:36       ` Alan Cox
2003-09-10 14:17       ` Pavel Machek
2003-09-11  6:28     ` Adrian Bunk
2003-09-11 11:04       ` Dave Jones
2003-09-12 20:41         ` Adrian Bunk
2003-09-11 12:10       ` Maciej W. Rozycki
2003-09-12 19:07         ` Adrian Bunk
2003-09-16 12:34           ` Maciej W. Rozycki
2003-09-11 14:25       ` Alan Cox
2003-09-13 10:37         ` Adrian Bunk
2003-09-07 17:51 ` Adrian Bunk
2003-09-07 11:28 Adrian Bunk
2003-09-07 11:46 ` Jan-Benedict Glaw
2003-09-07 13:17   ` Adrian Bunk
2003-09-07 13:48     ` Jan-Benedict Glaw
2003-09-07 12:42 ` Sam Ravnborg
2003-09-07 12:51   ` Adrian Bunk
2003-09-07 12:42 ` Robert Schwebel
2003-09-07 13:00   ` Adrian Bunk
2003-09-07 13:14     ` Robert Schwebel
2003-09-08 15:26       ` Tom Rini
2003-09-07 17:31     ` Alan Cox
2003-09-07 17:48       ` Robert Schwebel
2003-09-07 18:04         ` Alan Cox
2003-09-07 18:26           ` Robert Schwebel
2003-09-07 19:17             ` Alan Cox
2003-09-07 19:17             ` Alan Cox
2003-09-07 17:25 ` Alan Cox
2003-09-11  6:19   ` Adrian Bunk
2003-09-08  0:46 ` Rusty Russell
2003-09-08 14:29   ` Adrian Bunk
2003-09-09  1:11     ` Rusty Russell
2003-09-11  6:22       ` Adrian Bunk

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20030913220706.GM27368@fs.tum.de \
    --to=bunk@fs.tum.de \
    --cc=davej@redhat.com \
    --cc=jgarzik@pobox.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®