From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S262683AbTIQGrM (ORCPT ); Wed, 17 Sep 2003 02:47:12 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S262684AbTIQGrM (ORCPT ); Wed, 17 Sep 2003 02:47:12 -0400 Received: from fw.osdl.org ([65.172.181.6]:29318 "EHLO mail.osdl.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S262683AbTIQGrL (ORCPT ); Wed, 17 Sep 2003 02:47:11 -0400 Date: Tue, 16 Sep 2003 23:47:46 -0700 From: Andrew Morton To: Nick Piggin Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] must fix list Message-Id: <20030916234746.0612ec90.akpm@osdl.org> In-Reply-To: <3F67EDAF.40608@cyberone.com.au> References: <3F67EDAF.40608@cyberone.com.au> X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 0.9.4 (GTK+ 1.2.10; i686-pc-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Nick Piggin wrote: > > I don't know what happened to this, but I thought it was quite good. > Maybe I missed something? It just didn't seem very relevant: people weren't keeping me up to date and a lot of the patches which were going in weren't related to anything on the lists. > Anyway I have removed AS from the list because it is done. I removed CFQ > as well because when the schedulers become runtime selectable (sometime > I hope), merging it becomes a non issue, even during the stable series I > think. > > I updated the kernel/sched.c section a bit. > > I moved 64-bit dev_t from should fix to must fix. > > It looks like quite a bit can be struck off, but I'll leave it up to those > who actually did the work. Thanks. Just for you, I'll do an update. > Maybe these should go in Documentation/must-fix/ to make patching and > syncing easier? maybe...