Re: experiences beyond 4 GB RAM with 2.4.22

[Stephan von Krawczynski <skraw@ithnet.com>]

On Thu, 18 Sep 2003 09:12:49 +0200
Jens Axboe <axboe@suse.de> wrote:

> On Thu, Sep 18 2003, Jens Axboe wrote:
> > On Wed, Sep 17 2003, Marcelo Tosatti wrote:
> > > 
> > > 
> > > On Wed, 17 Sep 2003, Jens Axboe wrote:
> > > 
> > > > On Wed, Sep 17 2003, Alan Cox wrote:
> > > > > On Maw, 2003-09-16 at 20:58, Olivier Galibert wrote:
> > > > > > On Tue, Sep 16, 2003 at 04:29:02PM +0100, Alan Cox wrote:
> > > > > > > The kernel has no idea what you will do with given ram. It does
> > > > > > > try to make some guesses but you are basically trying to paper
> > > > > > > over hardware limits.
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > Is there a way to specifically turn that ram into a tmpfs though?
> > > > > 
> > > > > 
> > > > > Something like z2ram copied and hacked a little to kmap the blocks it
> > > > > wants would give you a block device you could use for swap or for
> > > > > /tmp. Im not sure tmpfs would work here
> > > > 
> > > > Aditionally, you need GFP_DMA32 or similar. Would also alleviate the
> > > > nasty pressure on ZONE_NORMAL which is often quite stressed.
> > > 
> > > IMO such GFP_DMA32 flag is a bit intrusive for 2.4, isnt it?
> > 
> > Not really, it's just an extra zone. Maybe I can dig such a patch up, I
> > had one for 2.4.2-pre something...
> 
> This is the latest I had, for 2.4.5. Pretty simple and nonintrusive at
> that time.

>From a design point of view I would pretty much agree with your idea. In fact
there is a ram attribute (dma32) which currently is not reflected in the data
structures in a selectable way. I can see no good reason for this lack.

Regards,
Stephan