mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Mark Wong <markw@osdl.org>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linstab@osdl.org
Subject: Re: [Linstab] Hackbench STP Results History for 2.5 mm/2.6 mm
Date: Thu, 18 Sep 2003 17:58:42 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20030918175842.A21411@osdlab.pdx.osdl.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20030918170754.6164e770.akpm@osdl.org>; from akpm@osdl.org on Thu, Sep 18, 2003 at 05:07:54PM -0700

On Thu, Sep 18, 2003 at 05:07:54PM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
> markw@osdl.org wrote:
> >
> > More history from hackbench from STP from the 2.5 and 2.6 mm kernels.
> 
> This looks great, but tragically incomprehensible.
> 
> Could someone please provide some interpretation, tell us what hackbench
> is, and what all the numbers mean?
> 
> Do we rock or do we suck?

Sorry, I was a bit hasty.

Hackbench is a test from Rusty Russel that's intended to test the scalability
of the scheduler.  The results I gathered are from a test where 100 processes
are started to send a message to another set of 100 processes.  This is
repeated at least a few times and the time taken to complete each instance
is averaged.  Anyone feel free to correct me as I learned this second hand.

The general trend in the metric indicates everything has been improving, so I
think we rock.

  parent reply	other threads:[~2003-09-19  0:58 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2003-09-19  0:12 markw
2003-09-19  0:07 ` [Linstab] " Andrew Morton
2003-09-19  0:57   ` Andreas Dilger
2003-09-19  0:58   ` Mark Wong [this message]
2003-09-19 15:45     ` Craig Thomas

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20030918175842.A21411@osdlab.pdx.osdl.net \
    --to=markw@osdl.org \
    --cc=akpm@osdl.org \
    --cc=linstab@osdl.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®