From: Badari Pulavarty <pbadari@us.ibm.com>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Suparna Bhattacharya <suparna@in.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: use O_DIRECT open file, when read will hang.
Date: Fri, 19 Sep 2003 09:39:18 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <200309190939.18796.pbadari@us.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20030918225450.3d6bb72c.akpm@osdl.org>
On Thursday 18 September 2003 10:54 pm, Andrew Morton wrote:
> Hugang <hugang@soulinfo.com> wrote:
> > Hello all:
> >
> > Steps to reproduce:
> >
> > rm -f /tmp/1.log
> > touch /tmp/1.log
> > echo << EOF > /tmp/hang.c
> > #include <sys/types.h>
> > #include <asm/fcntl.h>
> >
> > main()
> > {
> > int i;
> > char buf[1025];
> >
> > i = open("/tmp/1.log", O_RDONLY | 040000, 0);
> > if ( i != -1) {
> > read(i, buf, 1);
> > }
> > printf("'%s'", buf);
> > }
> > EOF
> > gcc -o /tmp/hang /tmp/hang.c
> > /tmp/hang
>
> This is due to O_DIRECT-race-fixes.patch forgetting to drop locks
> on error paths all over the place.
>
> I think this patch plugs them all for block-based direct-io, but it needs
> checking.
>
> There's also the little matter of (say) NFS direct-io which doesn't go
> through fs/direct-io.c at all; it will deadlock in a jiffy.
>
> Must say that I am getting very concerned about the general state of the IO
> paths in the -mm kernel.
Andrew,
I am also seeing some kind of regression on raw in 2.6.0-test5-mm2.
Unfortunately, this happens only with huge database benchmarks.
I still haven't narrowed it down.
So I am planning to do following to address your concerns.
1) I am going to do full code review of DIO & RAW code in -mm tree.
2) I want to test RAW & DIO code with various test cases we have.
- fsx:
on RAW, DIO on files, AIO on RAW, AIO on files, AIO-DIO on files
- rawiobench
on RAW, DIO on files, AIO on RAW, AIO on files, AIO-DIO on files
- database benchmarks:
on RAW, on files
- can I do fsx, rawiobench on NFS files to test DIO on NFS ?
- What else you would like to see ?
Thanks,
Badari
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2003-09-19 16:40 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2003-09-19 4:46 Hugang
2003-09-19 5:54 ` Andrew Morton
2003-09-19 16:39 ` Badari Pulavarty [this message]
2003-09-19 16:57 ` Andrew Morton
2003-09-19 17:38 ` Badari Pulavarty
2003-09-19 22:12 ` Badari Pulavarty
2003-09-19 13:06 ` Richard B. Johnson
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=200309190939.18796.pbadari@us.ibm.com \
--to=pbadari@us.ibm.com \
--cc=akpm@osdl.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=suparna@in.ibm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®