From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S262068AbTI0Dzy (ORCPT ); Fri, 26 Sep 2003 23:55:54 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S262072AbTI0Dzy (ORCPT ); Fri, 26 Sep 2003 23:55:54 -0400 Received: from rth.ninka.net ([216.101.162.244]:41650 "EHLO rth.ninka.net") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S262068AbTI0Dzx (ORCPT ); Fri, 26 Sep 2003 23:55:53 -0400 Date: Fri, 26 Sep 2003 20:55:50 -0700 From: "David S. Miller" To: Dana Lacoste Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: route cache and messed up network Message-Id: <20030926205550.15a3edf2.davem@redhat.com> In-Reply-To: <1064591600.84549.1.camel@dlacoste.ottawa.loran.com> References: <1064518793.42554.93.camel@dlacoste.ottawa.loran.com> <1064591600.84549.1.camel@dlacoste.ottawa.loran.com> X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 0.9.5 (GTK+ 1.2.10; i686-pc-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Fri, 26 Sep 2003 11:53:21 -0400 Dana Lacoste wrote: > (Originally sent to linux-net, but that list seems to > be almost zero traffic lately :) And if linux-net doesn't give you a reply, which is where the networking developers actually read postings, your chances of getting a reply here are even lower. Please, keep networking questions on the lists where the net developers actually are, not here. We're trying to create a situation where someone who wants to get involved in networking development is not required to sift through the hundreds of postings each day on linux-kernel. You could try netdev@oss.sgi.com as well. Thanks.