From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S261196AbTI3I2G (ORCPT ); Tue, 30 Sep 2003 04:28:06 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S261218AbTI3I2G (ORCPT ); Tue, 30 Sep 2003 04:28:06 -0400 Received: from mailrelay.tu-graz.ac.at ([129.27.3.7]:11508 "EHLO mailrelay02.tugraz.at") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S261196AbTI3I2E (ORCPT ); Tue, 30 Sep 2003 04:28:04 -0400 From: Thomas Winkler Reply-To: tom@qwws.net To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: BugReport (test6): USB (ACPI), SWSUSP, E100 Date: Tue, 30 Sep 2003 10:27:37 +0200 User-Agent: KMail/1.5.1 References: <200309291551.00446.tom@qwws.net> <20030929164950.GA27226@ppp0.net> In-Reply-To: <20030929164950.GA27226@ppp0.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200309301027.37763.tom@qwws.net> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hello, I just tested to uhci-hsd one-line patch sent by Wim Van Sebroeck. USB works fine again now. In addition to that the strange e100 problems are also gone now. I double checked this by removing the patch once again. Without the patch e100 is dead, with the patch everything works fine. Interesting what an USB patch can do to a NIC (a side effect of irq problems?). This only leaves the SWSUP problem open. An echo 4 > /proc/acpi/sleep still shows no effect at all (see also the original mail). Is SWSUP supposed to work in test6? bye, -- Tom Winkler e-mail: tom@qwws.net