From: Vojtech Pavlik <vojtech@suse.cz>
To: Paul <set@pobox.com>, Vojtech Pavlik <vojtech@suse.cz>,
Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: keyboard repeat / sound [was Re: Linux 2.6.0-test6]
Date: Tue, 30 Sep 2003 14:51:26 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20030930125126.GA24122@ucw.cz> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20030930075024.GA1620@squish.home.loc>
On Tue, Sep 30, 2003 at 03:50:24AM -0400, Paul wrote:
> Vojtech Pavlik <vojtech@suse.cz>, on Mon Sep 29, 2003 [05:16:43 PM] said:
> > On Sun, Sep 28, 2003 at 10:59:02AM +0200, Roger Luethi wrote:
> >
> > > With test6, keyboard repeat takes very noticably longer to kick in after X
> > > has been started (for both X and console). In test5, starting X makes no
> > > difference.
> >
> > Bug in repeat rate setting code. Thanks for reporting, this should fix
> > it:
> >
> Hi;
>
> I applied this patch to 2.6.0-test6, but the delay before
> repeat kicks in is slower than previous versions. It seems more like
> the latest 2.4 kernel.
This is because it is the same as on the latest 2.4 kernel. 2.6 used
software autorepeat up to test6. Now, because of hardware bugs, it was
necessary to switch back to hardware autorepeat, like 2.4 uses.
> Note, this isnt the speed of the repeat, but
> the delay before it kicks in. Havent tested unpatched test6.
> On the other hand, the mouse pointer (ps/2) has been kicked
> into overdrive. much faster than test5 and latest 2.4.
Interesting. This probably has much to do with mouse acceleration
settings. What was done was that the mouse report rate was made LOWER
(60 compared to 200) to cure problems with some systems that couldn't
handle the high report rate.
This makes the movement per report larger and thus the acceleration
formula in XFree then works more aggressively.
> Also, I think that the requirement to enable gameport in
> the input section to get access to some alsa sound drivers is
> a bug. Ive looked at the source to some, and they #ifdef around
> gameport support. test5 didnt have this problem for my 1371 driver.
That one is for ALSA people.
--
Vojtech Pavlik
SuSE Labs, SuSE CR
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2003-09-30 13:07 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 94+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2003-09-28 1:27 Linux 2.6.0-test6 Linus Torvalds
2003-09-28 7:03 ` Con Kolivas
2003-09-28 10:02 ` Rob Landley
2003-09-29 4:55 ` Nick Piggin
2003-09-29 7:35 ` Rob Landley
2003-09-29 16:55 ` Ed Sweetman
2003-09-30 0:03 ` Nick Piggin
2003-10-02 0:41 ` Pedro Larroy
2003-10-02 3:05 ` Nick Piggin
2003-10-02 19:07 ` Pedro Larroy
2003-10-03 0:07 ` Nick Piggin
2003-10-03 19:34 ` Pedro Larroy
2003-09-29 18:45 ` bill davidsen
2003-09-30 1:12 ` Nick Piggin
2003-10-01 21:13 ` bill davidsen
2003-10-02 2:45 ` Nick Piggin
2003-09-28 8:26 ` Markus Hästbacka
2003-09-28 10:54 ` Jeff Garzik
2003-09-28 8:59 ` keyboard repeat / sound [was Re: Linux 2.6.0-test6] Roger Luethi
2003-09-29 15:16 ` Vojtech Pavlik
2003-09-30 7:50 ` Paul
2003-09-30 12:51 ` Vojtech Pavlik [this message]
2003-09-30 13:21 ` Aristeu Sergio Rozanski Filho
2003-09-30 13:44 ` Vojtech Pavlik
2003-09-30 14:05 ` Aristeu Sergio Rozanski Filho
2003-09-30 14:16 ` Vojtech Pavlik
2003-10-01 23:51 ` Aristeu Sergio Rozanski Filho
2003-09-30 18:16 ` Mark W. Alexander
2003-10-01 23:52 ` Aristeu Sergio Rozanski Filho
2003-09-28 10:09 ` Linux 2.6.0-test6 Rafał 'rmrmg' Roszak
2003-09-28 11:05 ` Andreas Jellinghaus
2003-09-28 12:34 ` Dave Jones
2003-09-28 16:12 ` Andreas Jellinghaus
2003-09-28 17:51 ` Andries Brouwer
2003-09-28 16:42 ` Ivan Gyurdiev
2003-09-28 20:26 ` [patch] 2.6.0-test6: correct hdlcdrv.h prototypes Adrian Bunk
2003-09-29 13:23 ` Linux 2.6.0-test6 Florin Iucha
2003-09-29 13:55 ` Muli Ben-Yehuda
2003-09-29 14:01 ` Jaroslav Kysela
2003-09-29 14:18 ` Muli Ben-Yehuda
2003-09-29 19:04 ` bill davidsen
2003-09-29 14:30 ` Takashi Iwai
2003-09-29 13:58 ` Jaroslav Kysela
2003-09-29 16:30 ` Linux 2.6.0-test6 (compile statistics) John Cherry
2003-09-29 17:44 ` Jesper Juhl
2003-10-06 20:39 ` John Cherry
2003-10-01 8:58 ` Who changed /proc/<pid>/ in 2.6.0-test5-bk9? Mikael Pettersson
2003-10-01 11:52 ` John Levon
2003-10-01 20:21 ` bill davidsen
2003-10-02 1:00 ` John Levon
2003-10-06 3:01 ` bill davidsen
2003-10-01 15:11 ` Linus Torvalds
2003-10-01 20:58 ` bill davidsen
2003-10-01 23:42 ` Albert Cahalan
2003-10-02 0:38 ` Linus Torvalds
2003-10-02 0:57 ` Albert Cahalan
2003-10-02 3:35 ` Ulrich Drepper
2003-10-02 4:12 ` Albert Cahalan
2003-10-02 4:58 ` Ulrich Drepper
2003-10-02 13:48 ` Albert Cahalan
2003-10-02 17:30 ` Ulrich Drepper
2003-10-03 0:03 ` Albert Cahalan
2003-10-03 0:40 ` Linus Torvalds
2003-10-03 2:53 ` Jamie Lokier
2003-10-06 4:54 ` Mike Fedyk
2003-10-06 2:52 ` bill davidsen
2003-10-07 23:08 ` Robert White
2003-10-07 22:46 ` Robert White
2003-10-07 23:25 ` Linus Torvalds
2003-10-08 0:41 ` Robert White
2003-10-08 0:54 ` Linus Torvalds
2003-10-08 2:31 ` Robert White
2003-10-08 2:39 ` David Lang
2003-10-08 2:59 ` Robert White
2003-10-09 18:25 ` bill davidsen
2003-10-08 2:47 ` Who changed /proc/<pid>/ in 2.6.0-test5-bk9? (SIGPIPE?) Robert White
2003-10-08 2:57 ` Linus Torvalds
2003-10-08 4:01 ` Robert White
2003-10-08 4:08 ` Linus Torvalds
2003-10-08 10:47 ` Who changed /proc/<pid>/ in 2.6.0-test5-bk9? bert hubert
2003-10-08 19:12 ` Ulrich Drepper
2003-10-09 18:43 ` bill davidsen
2003-10-08 21:54 ` Robert White
2003-10-09 18:12 ` bill davidsen
2003-10-10 4:39 ` Jamie Lokier
2003-10-09 17:59 ` bill davidsen
2003-10-11 3:02 ` Here is a case that proves my previous position wrong regurading CLONE_THREAD and CLONE_FILES Robert White
2003-10-11 3:48 ` viro
2003-10-12 11:41 ` Jamie Lokier
2003-10-02 8:46 ` Who changed /proc/<pid>/ in 2.6.0-test5-bk9? Miquel van Smoorenburg
2003-10-02 22:35 ` Jamie Lokier
2003-10-02 23:43 ` Miquel van Smoorenburg
2003-10-06 2:57 ` bill davidsen
2003-10-02 3:38 ` Ulrich Drepper
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20030930125126.GA24122@ucw.cz \
--to=vojtech@suse.cz \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=set@pobox.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®