From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S261909AbTJAEyP (ORCPT ); Wed, 1 Oct 2003 00:54:15 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S261910AbTJAEyP (ORCPT ); Wed, 1 Oct 2003 00:54:15 -0400 Received: from fw.osdl.org ([65.172.181.6]:19657 "EHLO mail.osdl.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S261909AbTJAEyO (ORCPT ); Wed, 1 Oct 2003 00:54:14 -0400 Date: Tue, 30 Sep 2003 21:55:12 -0700 From: Andrew Morton To: "Murray J. Root" Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: 2.6.0-test6 scheduling(?) oddness Message-Id: <20030930215512.1df59be3.akpm@osdl.org> In-Reply-To: <20031001032238.GB1416@Master> References: <20031001032238.GB1416@Master> X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 0.9.4 (GTK+ 1.2.10; i686-pc-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org "Murray J. Root" wrote: > > The render finishes in the same 30 minutes, then oowriter starts. > oowriter takes about 3 seconds to load if no rendering is going on. OpenOffice uses sched_yield() in strange ways which causes it to get hopelessly starved on 2.6 kernels. I think RH have a fixed version, but I don't know if that has propagated into the upstream yet. So... Don't worry about OpenOffice too much. Is the problem reproducible with other applications?