From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S262018AbTJAGwT (ORCPT ); Wed, 1 Oct 2003 02:52:19 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S262021AbTJAGwT (ORCPT ); Wed, 1 Oct 2003 02:52:19 -0400 Received: from fw.osdl.org ([65.172.181.6]:26264 "EHLO mail.osdl.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S262018AbTJAGwS (ORCPT ); Wed, 1 Oct 2003 02:52:18 -0400 Date: Tue, 30 Sep 2003 23:53:17 -0700 From: Andrew Morton To: "Murray J. Root" Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: 2.6.0-test6 scheduling(?) oddness Message-Id: <20030930235317.1d293a71.akpm@osdl.org> In-Reply-To: <20031001051827.GE1416@Master> References: <20031001032238.GB1416@Master> <20030930215512.1df59be3.akpm@osdl.org> <3F7A604F.1060905@cyberone.com.au> <20031001051827.GE1416@Master> X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 0.9.4 (GTK+ 1.2.10; i686-pc-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org "Murray J. Root" wrote: > (the linux-kernel email convention is "reply to all", btw) > test6 goes from 30 mins to 24 mins - still worse than test5 by a lot. What sort of context switch rate are you seeing during this run? Running `vmstat 1' will tell.