From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S262629AbTJAXOv (ORCPT ); Wed, 1 Oct 2003 19:14:51 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S262633AbTJAXOv (ORCPT ); Wed, 1 Oct 2003 19:14:51 -0400 Received: from fw.osdl.org ([65.172.181.6]:48027 "EHLO mail.osdl.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S262629AbTJAXOu (ORCPT ); Wed, 1 Oct 2003 19:14:50 -0400 Date: Wed, 1 Oct 2003 16:14:42 -0700 From: Chris Wright To: James Morris Cc: Rik van Riel , Chris Wright , torvalds@osdl.org, greg@kroah.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, vserver@solucorp.qc.ca Subject: Re: sys_vserver Message-ID: <20031001161442.B14425@osdlab.pdx.osdl.net> References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i In-Reply-To: ; from jmorris@redhat.com on Wed, Oct 01, 2003 at 06:57:46PM -0400 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org * James Morris (jmorris@redhat.com) wrote: > I think virtualization is important/useful enough to warrant an API of > it's own. It could be similar to LSM, e.g. allow pluggable > virtualization modules, with no cost for the base kernel. Doesn't sound like 2.6 material.