From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S263007AbTJAXcO (ORCPT ); Wed, 1 Oct 2003 19:32:14 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S263010AbTJAXcN (ORCPT ); Wed, 1 Oct 2003 19:32:13 -0400 Received: from fw.osdl.org ([65.172.181.6]:53925 "EHLO mail.osdl.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S263007AbTJAXcM (ORCPT ); Wed, 1 Oct 2003 19:32:12 -0400 Date: Wed, 1 Oct 2003 16:32:03 -0700 From: Chris Wright To: Rik van Riel Cc: Chris Wright , James Morris , torvalds@osdl.org, greg@kroah.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, vserver@solucorp.qc.ca Subject: Re: sys_vserver Message-ID: <20031001163203.U14398@osdlab.pdx.osdl.net> References: <20031001161442.B14425@osdlab.pdx.osdl.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i In-Reply-To: ; from riel@redhat.com on Wed, Oct 01, 2003 at 07:17:44PM -0400 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org * Rik van Riel (riel@redhat.com) wrote: > On Wed, 1 Oct 2003, Chris Wright wrote: > > * James Morris (jmorris@redhat.com) wrote: > > > I think virtualization is important/useful enough to warrant an API of > > > it's own. It could be similar to LSM, e.g. allow pluggable > > > virtualization modules, with no cost for the base kernel. > > > > Doesn't sound like 2.6 material. > > Maybe not, but it does sound like something we want to be > ready by the time 2.7 is forked ;) Yes, good point ;-) And I do agree it's a useful concept. -- Linux Security Modules http://lsm.immunix.org http://lsm.bkbits.net