From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S262379AbTJAT3e (ORCPT ); Wed, 1 Oct 2003 15:29:34 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S262359AbTJAT3e (ORCPT ); Wed, 1 Oct 2003 15:29:34 -0400 Received: from turing-police.cc.vt.edu ([128.173.14.107]:27009 "EHLO turing-police.cc.vt.edu") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S262576AbTJAT2j (ORCPT ); Wed, 1 Oct 2003 15:28:39 -0400 Message-Id: <200310011928.h91JSWfc004655@turing-police.cc.vt.edu> X-Mailer: exmh version 2.6.3 04/04/2003 with nmh-1.0.4+dev To: John Lange Cc: Linux Kernel Subject: Re: A new model for ports and kernel security? In-Reply-To: Your message of "Wed, 01 Oct 2003 14:06:23 CDT." <1065035183.5142.50.camel@mars> From: Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu References: <1065035183.5142.50.camel@mars> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="==_Exmh_-1599646080P"; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Date: Wed, 01 Oct 2003 15:28:32 -0400 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org --==_Exmh_-1599646080P Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii On Wed, 01 Oct 2003 14:06:23 CDT, John Lange said: > Suggestion: A groups based port binding security system for both > outgoing and incoming port binding. I believe this sort of thing is already in the grsecurity patch. See http://www.grsecurity.org --==_Exmh_-1599646080P Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.2 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Exmh version 2.5 07/13/2001 iD8DBQE/eyrgcC3lWbTT17ARAufBAJ95y3RdEDff0kekzcL893wgzx6w1ACfTNFf II7iDi2Cn5g8G6X6/3j77yo= =C8Mr -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --==_Exmh_-1599646080P--