From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S262971AbTJEFhL (ORCPT ); Sun, 5 Oct 2003 01:37:11 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S262973AbTJEFhL (ORCPT ); Sun, 5 Oct 2003 01:37:11 -0400 Received: from fw.osdl.org ([65.172.181.6]:34774 "EHLO mail.osdl.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S262971AbTJEFhJ (ORCPT ); Sun, 5 Oct 2003 01:37:09 -0400 Date: Sat, 4 Oct 2003 22:38:38 -0700 From: Andrew Morton To: insecure@mail.od.ua Cc: jgarzik@pobox.com, lm@bitmover.com, hannal@us.ibm.com, lse-tech@lists.sourceforge.net, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: Minutes from 10/1 LSE Call Message-Id: <20031004223838.338bf4f4.akpm@osdl.org> In-Reply-To: <200310030138.34430.insecure@mail.od.ua> References: <37940000.1065035945@w-hlinder> <200310022156.49678.insecure@mail.od.ua> <3F7C780C.9040001@pobox.com> <200310030138.34430.insecure@mail.od.ua> X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 0.9.4 (GTK+ 1.2.10; i686-pc-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org insecure wrote: > > So: > * we hit a ceiling of ~133 Mb/s, no matter how many disks > * CPU utilization is 100%, spent mostly in copy_to_user > * RAM bandwidth is >1Gb/s > > These can't be true at once. True. But bear in mind that the data crosses the memory busses up to three times: disk to pagecache, pagecache to CPU, CPU to user memory. So top speed may be as little as 300 MB/sec.