From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S262582AbTJIVJ1 (ORCPT ); Thu, 9 Oct 2003 17:09:27 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S262587AbTJIVJ1 (ORCPT ); Thu, 9 Oct 2003 17:09:27 -0400 Received: from mion.elka.pw.edu.pl ([194.29.160.35]:52216 "EHLO mion.elka.pw.edu.pl") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S262582AbTJIVJW (ORCPT ); Thu, 9 Oct 2003 17:09:22 -0400 From: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz To: Stefan Kaltenbrunner Subject: Re: Serverworks CSB5 IDE-DMA Problem (2.4 and 2.6) Date: Thu, 9 Oct 2003 23:13:05 +0200 User-Agent: KMail/1.5.4 Cc: marcelo.tosatti@cyclades.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org References: <200310092146.17695.bzolnier@elka.pw.edu.pl> <3F85CC0E.50003@madness.at> In-Reply-To: <3F85CC0E.50003@madness.at> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-2" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200310092313.05371.bzolnier@elka.pw.edu.pl> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thursday 09 of October 2003 22:58, Stefan Kaltenbrunner wrote: > Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz wrote: > > APIC problem should be fixed, but yes it's better to disable ACPI. > > Not sure if I understand this one right - the dmesg was from the > 2.6.0-test6 kernel which did have ACPI HT-enum-only compiled in but no > "local APIC support". > The 2.4.22 one that has the same problem does neither have ACPI nor APIC > support compiled in - so no this doesn't seem to be the problem. Okay. > > These "timeout due to drive busy" needs to be resolved. > > Yes - I really hope this will be fixed soon. I was forced to add a > fiberchannel HBA into this maschine today to integrate it into our SAN > to get the database up to speed again. > However I'm willing to move the database to the local disks again if you > want me to test a patch or something along that line. Did some kernel worked okay or this is new system? --bartlomiej