From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S263244AbTJKCFh (ORCPT ); Fri, 10 Oct 2003 22:05:37 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S263248AbTJKCFh (ORCPT ); Fri, 10 Oct 2003 22:05:37 -0400 Received: from smtp.terra.es ([213.4.129.129]:41122 "EHLO tsmtp10.mail.isp") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S263244AbTJKCFg convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT ); Fri, 10 Oct 2003 22:05:36 -0400 Date: Sat, 11 Oct 2003 04:04:35 +0200 From: --- To: "Frederick, Fabian" Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [2.7 "thoughts"] V0.3 Message-Id: <20031011040435.299bd3bc.grundig@teleline.es> In-Reply-To: References: X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 0.9.6 (GTK+ 1.2.10; i386-pc-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org El Fri, 10 Oct 2003 09:54:12 +0200 "Frederick, Fabian" escribió: > 2.7 "thoughts" > Thanks to Gabor, Stuart, Stephan and others > Don't hesitate to send me more or comment. On thing me (as a user) would like to see is more user limits. In particular; a (small) per-user mlock limit would be nice so a normal user can mlock some memory to avoid buffer underruns without needing to give suid permissions to cdrecord (which is what people uses now and guarantees you'll have to update your cdrecord copy some day due to unavoidable security issues). I wonder if this is a good wishlist item or just a stupid idea... Diego Calleja