From: "Robert L. Harris" <Robert.L.Harris@rdlg.net>
To: Linux-Kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Stale NFS Handles in 2.6
Date: Sat, 11 Oct 2003 09:41:27 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20031011134127.GU20940@rdlg.net> (raw)
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1943 bytes --]
> > Hi,
> > since 2.6.0-test6 I get "Stale NFS file handle" when transferring huge
> > amounts
> > of data from a nfs-server which is running on -test6.
> > The client also runs -test6. Transfers from a server running kernel
> > 2.4.22
> > work flawless.
> >
> > I use the nfs-kernel-server 1.0.6 on Debian/sid.
>
> Are you using mount options when mounting the NFS volume?
> I had this problem when I used rsize=8192 and wsize=8192 as nfs mount
> options. Just left them out and everything was fine again.
>
> Axel
Will this help the Stale NFS problem I'm getting as well? (Detailed
below)
---------------------------------
> >
> >
> > I've been trying to run my NFS server on 2.6 kernels for a while
> > now.
> > My desktop and my Firewall are both 2.6 already and happy. My
> > fileserver though is giving me an ulcer.
>
> > I get the stale handles. Reverting back to 2.4 and all is well on
> > the
> > same export and mount configs.
> >
> > Thoughts?
> you could search the archives for "NFS Problem" and "STALE", you
> will probably find my post near end of September. The short solution:
>
> Use "no_subtree_check" in /etc/exports like this:
>
> /home \
> tony.local.net(rw,sync,no_root_squash,no_subtree_check)
>
> I think I have found a bug in the nfs server code that always
> returns a failure on subtree checks. I described my findings in
> a post to this list, but nobody answered.
----------------------------------
:wq!
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Robert L. Harris | GPG Key ID: E344DA3B
@ x-hkp://pgp.mit.edu
DISCLAIMER:
These are MY OPINIONS ALONE. I speak for no-one else.
Life is not a destination, it's a journey.
Microsoft produces 15 car pileups on the highway.
Don't stop traffic to stand and gawk at the tragedy.
[-- Attachment #2: Digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 189 bytes --]
reply other threads:[~2003-10-11 13:41 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: [no followups] expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20031011134127.GU20940@rdlg.net \
--to=robert.l.harris@rdlg.net \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®