From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner+willy=40w.ods.org@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
	id S263384AbTJKTZ3 (ORCPT <rfc822;willy@w.ods.org>);
	Sat, 11 Oct 2003 15:25:29 -0400
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S263387AbTJKTZ2
	(ORCPT <rfc822;linux-kernel-outgoing>);
	Sat, 11 Oct 2003 15:25:28 -0400
Received: from parcelfarce.linux.theplanet.co.uk ([195.92.249.252]:20968 "EHLO
	www.linux.org.uk") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S263384AbTJKTZ0
	(ORCPT <rfc822;linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>);
	Sat, 11 Oct 2003 15:25:26 -0400
Date: Sat, 11 Oct 2003 20:25:25 +0100
From: viro@parcelfarce.linux.theplanet.co.uk
To: Kenn Humborg <kenn@linux.ie>
Cc: asdfd esadd <retu834@yahoo.com>, Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu,
       linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: 2.7 thoughts: common well-architected object model
Message-ID: <20031011192525.GI7665@parcelfarce.linux.theplanet.co.uk>
References: <20031011175744.GA15610@excalibur.research.wombat.ie> <20031011183405.38980.qmail@web13007.mail.yahoo.com> <20031011190102.GA18624@excalibur.research.wombat.ie>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20031011190102.GA18624@excalibur.research.wombat.ie>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

On Sat, Oct 11, 2003 at 08:01:02PM +0100, Kenn Humborg wrote:
> "evolved to" is the wrong term - "wrapped by" is more accurate

No, it's perfectly accurate - as mushrooms left in a fridge for too long
evolve into a large collection of other mushroom species...