From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S263378AbTJKTkO (ORCPT ); Sat, 11 Oct 2003 15:40:14 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S263380AbTJKTkO (ORCPT ); Sat, 11 Oct 2003 15:40:14 -0400 Received: from pasmtp.tele.dk ([193.162.159.95]:16140 "EHLO pasmtp.tele.dk") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S263378AbTJKTkL (ORCPT ); Sat, 11 Oct 2003 15:40:11 -0400 Date: Sat, 11 Oct 2003 21:40:08 +0200 From: Sam Ravnborg To: "David S. Miller" Cc: "Randy.Dunlap" , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, netdev@oss.sgi.com Subject: Re: patches for PROC_FS=n (2.6.0-test7) Message-ID: <20031011194008.GA2395@mars.ravnborg.org> Mail-Followup-To: "David S. Miller" , "Randy.Dunlap" , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, netdev@oss.sgi.com References: <20031010141646.779f10bb.rddunlap@osdl.org> <20031011120852.13fa8ec4.davem@redhat.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20031011120852.13fa8ec4.davem@redhat.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Sat, Oct 11, 2003 at 12:08:52PM -0700, David S. Miller wrote: > On Fri, 10 Oct 2003 14:16:46 -0700 > "Randy.Dunlap" wrote: > > > http://developer.osdl.org/rddunlap/patches/atmprocfs_260t7.patch > > How can this be needed? When procfs is disabled then > remove_proc_entry() is defined as "do { } while (0)", ie. a nop. Due to this - the real offender: from: net/atm/clip.c: #ifdef CONFIG_PROC_FS #include #include #endif Sam