From: viro@parcelfarce.linux.theplanet.co.uk
To: retu <retu834@yahoo.com>
Cc: Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu, Jamie Lokier <jamie@shareable.org>,
Kenn Humborg <kenn@linux.ie>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: 2.7 thoughts: common well-architected object model
Date: Sun, 12 Oct 2003 18:50:00 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20031012174959.GM7665@parcelfarce.linux.theplanet.co.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20031012165119.17264.qmail@web13004.mail.yahoo.com>
On Sun, Oct 12, 2003 at 09:51:19AM -0700, retu wrote:
>
> nobody says that it belongs into the kernel rather
> designed by core=kernel folks core-up, that is e.g.
> not being a derivative of a set of all-encompassing
> classes developed for an application.
>
> I think the issue is serious and brushing it aside as
> being non-kernel at first will come back biting.
> What's going on could be described as being cornered.
With all due respect, whether you are cornered or not is none of our
problems. Neither is whatever passes for your thought process. So far
you have failed to produce anything except handwaving and some remarkably
ugly function prototypes. Not interesting...
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2003-10-12 17:50 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 31+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2003-10-11 4:45 asdfd esadd
2003-10-11 14:30 ` Valdis.Kletnieks
2003-10-11 16:06 ` asdfd esadd
2003-10-11 16:48 ` Valdis.Kletnieks
2003-10-11 17:13 ` asdfd esadd
2003-10-11 17:38 ` Valdis.Kletnieks
2003-10-11 17:56 ` asdfd esadd
2003-10-11 18:20 ` Mark Hahn
2003-10-11 18:13 ` Zwane Mwaikambo
2003-10-11 23:33 ` J.A. Magallon
2003-10-11 17:00 ` Scott Robert Ladd
2003-10-11 17:57 ` Kenn Humborg
2003-10-11 18:34 ` asdfd esadd
2003-10-11 18:46 ` Valdis.Kletnieks
2003-10-11 19:01 ` Kenn Humborg
2003-10-11 19:11 ` retu
2003-10-11 19:25 ` viro
2003-10-12 11:59 ` Jamie Lokier
2003-10-12 16:04 ` retu
2003-10-12 16:44 ` Valdis.Kletnieks
2003-10-12 16:51 ` retu
2003-10-12 17:50 ` viro [this message]
2003-10-12 21:52 ` Jamie Lokier
2003-10-12 20:21 ` Rik van Riel
2003-10-13 20:21 ` James Antill
2003-10-14 5:01 ` retu
2003-10-14 6:00 ` Nick Piggin
2003-10-14 5:31 ` retu
2003-10-14 6:05 ` Tim Hockin
2003-10-14 6:46 ` viro
[not found] <Ft4B.3ML.3@gated-at.bofh.it>
[not found] ` <FutO.5TB.29@gated-at.bofh.it>
2003-10-11 17:03 ` Ihar 'Philips' Filipau
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20031012174959.GM7665@parcelfarce.linux.theplanet.co.uk \
--to=viro@parcelfarce.linux.theplanet.co.uk \
--cc=Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu \
--cc=jamie@shareable.org \
--cc=kenn@linux.ie \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=retu834@yahoo.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®