From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S262190AbTJNGqz (ORCPT ); Tue, 14 Oct 2003 02:46:55 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S262193AbTJNGqz (ORCPT ); Tue, 14 Oct 2003 02:46:55 -0400 Received: from parcelfarce.linux.theplanet.co.uk ([195.92.249.252]:8422 "EHLO www.linux.org.uk") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S262190AbTJNGqy (ORCPT ); Tue, 14 Oct 2003 02:46:54 -0400 Date: Tue, 14 Oct 2003 07:46:53 +0100 From: viro@parcelfarce.linux.theplanet.co.uk To: retu Cc: James Antill , m.fioretti@inwind.it, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: 2.7 thoughts: common well-architected object model Message-ID: <20031014064653.GR7665@parcelfarce.linux.theplanet.co.uk> References: <20031014053155.31639.qmail@web13004.mail.yahoo.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20031014053155.31639.qmail@web13004.mail.yahoo.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, Oct 13, 2003 at 10:31:55PM -0700, retu wrote: > Now here's the competition: > > System [snip the revolting offense against Occam's Razor] > System.Xml.Xsl > > These are massive and can't be built in a day. But > with a very decent component model and design > philosphy on what to put in and what not it would > enable people to quickly fill in the blanks (plus > maybe some rapid abstracting/wrapping) which would do > a very lot for the OS. Please, take your cargo-cult education somewhere else. You are yet to show that you understand what does "component model" mean, let alone to demonstrate that you are capable of discussing benefits of such beasts. "It had been mentioned in lecture notes" doesn't cut it.