From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S263423AbTJQNET (ORCPT ); Fri, 17 Oct 2003 09:04:19 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S263453AbTJQNET (ORCPT ); Fri, 17 Oct 2003 09:04:19 -0400 Received: from caramon.arm.linux.org.uk ([212.18.232.186]:8723 "EHLO caramon.arm.linux.org.uk") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S263423AbTJQNEH (ORCPT ); Fri, 17 Oct 2003 09:04:07 -0400 Date: Fri, 17 Oct 2003 14:03:54 +0100 From: Russell King To: John Bradford Cc: Norman Diamond , Hans Reiser , Wes Janzen , Rogier Wolff , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: Blockbusting news, this is important (Re: Why are bad disk sectors numbered strangely, and what happens to them?) Message-ID: <20031017140354.A2415@flint.arm.linux.org.uk> Mail-Followup-To: John Bradford , Norman Diamond , Hans Reiser , Wes Janzen , Rogier Wolff , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org References: <32a101c3916c$e282e330$5cee4ca5@DIAMONDLX60> <200310131014.h9DAEwY3000241@81-2-122-30.bradfords.org.uk> <33a201c39174$2b936660$5cee4ca5@DIAMONDLX60> <20031014064925.GA12342@bitwizard.nl> <3F8BA037.9000705@sbcglobal.net> <3F8BBC08.6030901@namesys.com> <11bf01c39492$bc5307c0$3eee4ca5@DIAMONDLX60> <3F8FBADE.7020107@namesys.com> <126d01c3949f$91bdecc0$3eee4ca5@DIAMONDLX60> <200310171253.h9HCr1tw000933@81-2-122-30.bradfords.org.uk> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5.1i In-Reply-To: <200310171253.h9HCr1tw000933@81-2-122-30.bradfords.org.uk>; from john@grabjohn.com on Fri, Oct 17, 2003 at 01:53:01PM +0100 X-Message-Flag: Your copy of Microsoft Outlook is vulnerable to viruses. See www.mutt.org for more details. Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Fri, Oct 17, 2003 at 01:53:01PM +0100, John Bradford wrote: > I disagree - we haven't confirmed what happens in the error-on-write > situation. If it does indeed always remap the block, then I'd agree > that that aspect was perfectly sane. My comments were based upon the information contained within the mail which appeared to originate from the manufacturer. Plus, they were in *PRIVATE*. Sheesh. -- Russell King Linux kernel 2.6 ARM Linux - http://www.arm.linux.org.uk/ maintainer of: 2.6 PCMCIA - http://pcmcia.arm.linux.org.uk/ 2.6 Serial core