From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S263173AbTJUQwP (ORCPT ); Tue, 21 Oct 2003 12:52:15 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S263174AbTJUQwP (ORCPT ); Tue, 21 Oct 2003 12:52:15 -0400 Received: from [65.172.181.6] ([65.172.181.6]:4575 "EHLO mail.osdl.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S263173AbTJUQwP (ORCPT ); Tue, 21 Oct 2003 12:52:15 -0400 Date: Tue, 21 Oct 2003 09:52:09 -0700 From: Chris Wright To: Frank Cusack Cc: lkml Subject: Re: cset #'s stable? Message-ID: <20031021095209.A32703@osdlab.pdx.osdl.net> References: <20031021091347.A7526@google.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i In-Reply-To: <20031021091347.A7526@google.com>; from fcusack@fcusack.com on Tue, Oct 21, 2003 at 09:13:47AM -0700 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org * Frank Cusack (fcusack@fcusack.com) wrote: > Are changeset #'s stable? > > I'm specifically looking at linux-2.5/net/sunrpc/clnt.c, > "rev 1.1153.63.[123]" which I recorded earlier as 1.1153.48.[123]. No, they are not. The key, however, is stable (bk changes -k -r, for example). thanks, -chris -- Linux Security Modules http://lsm.immunix.org http://lsm.bkbits.net