From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S263346AbTJUUNl (ORCPT ); Tue, 21 Oct 2003 16:13:41 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S263349AbTJUUNl (ORCPT ); Tue, 21 Oct 2003 16:13:41 -0400 Received: from hermine.idb.hist.no ([158.38.50.15]:33295 "HELO hermine.idb.hist.no") by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id S263346AbTJUUNj (ORCPT ); Tue, 21 Oct 2003 16:13:39 -0400 Date: Tue, 21 Oct 2003 22:23:10 +0200 To: James Simmons Cc: Andrew Morton , Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu, schlicht@uni-mannheim.de, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org Subject: Re: 2.6.0-test8-mm1 Message-ID: <20031021202310.GA14993@hh.idb.hist.no> References: <20031020185613.7d670975.akpm@osdl.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.4i From: Helge Hafting Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, Oct 21, 2003 at 06:47:41PM +0100, James Simmons wrote: > > Okay I see people are having alot of problems in the -mm tree. I don't > have any problems but I'm working against Linus tree. Could people try the > patch against 2.6.0-test8 and tell me if they still have the same results. This patch was fine. 2.6.0-test8 with this patch booted and looked no different from plain 2.6.0-test8. I am using it for writing this. The problems must be in mm1 somehow. Helge Hafting