From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S262186AbTJYBDb (ORCPT ); Fri, 24 Oct 2003 21:03:31 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S262197AbTJYBDb (ORCPT ); Fri, 24 Oct 2003 21:03:31 -0400 Received: from lakshmi.addtoit.com ([198.99.130.6]:8721 "EHLO lakshmi.solana.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S262186AbTJYBDa (ORCPT ); Fri, 24 Oct 2003 21:03:30 -0400 Message-Id: <200310250108.h9P18paK003981@ccure.karaya.com> X-Mailer: exmh version 2.4 06/23/2000 with nmh-1.1-RC1 To: Brice Goglin cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: uml-patch-2.6.0-test8 In-Reply-To: Your message of "Wed, 22 Oct 2003 10:37:42 +0200." <20031022083742.GR8782@ens-lyon.fr> References: <20031022083742.GR8782@ens-lyon.fr> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Date: Fri, 24 Oct 2003 21:08:51 -0400 From: Jeff Dike Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Brice.Goglin@ens-lyon.fr said: > Hi Jeff, > Your last UML patch for 2.6.0-test8 looks fine for me, except when > enabling loadable module support (CONFIG_MODULES). Known problem, I haven't got around to implementing the changes needed for modules in 2.6. Jeff