From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S263294AbTJZQfd (ORCPT ); Sun, 26 Oct 2003 11:35:33 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S263299AbTJZQfd (ORCPT ); Sun, 26 Oct 2003 11:35:33 -0500 Received: from cambridge.merl.com ([137.203.190.1]:8928 "EHLO cambridge.merl.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S263294AbTJZQfa (ORCPT ); Sun, 26 Oct 2003 11:35:30 -0500 Date: Sun, 26 Oct 2003 11:35:29 -0500 Message-Id: <200310261635.h9QGZTe13121@localhost.localdomain> From: To: marco.roeland@xs4all.nl CC: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org In-reply-to: <20031026162422.GB23792@localhost> (message from Marco Roeland on Sun, 26 Oct 2003 17:24:22 +0100) Subject: Re: compile-time error in 2.6.0-test9 References: <200310261553.h9QFrb513039@localhost.localdomain> <20031026162422.GB23792@localhost> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org OK, I will put that patch in. Thanks! (and hmmm... maybe it _is_ time to upgrade gcc. Looking at the problems with long long unsigneds, that looks awfully familiar with a mailfiltering app I am coding that got GCC very wierded out. I thought it was just my l33t ex-FORTRAN-hack coding style that was the bug cause. :-) ). What's the recommended version of GCC these days? -Bill Yerazunis