From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S263885AbTJ1I3E (ORCPT ); Tue, 28 Oct 2003 03:29:04 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S263886AbTJ1I2y (ORCPT ); Tue, 28 Oct 2003 03:28:54 -0500 Received: from lindsey.linux-systeme.com ([62.241.33.80]:1801 "EHLO mx00.linux-systeme.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S263885AbTJ1I2x (ORCPT ); Tue, 28 Oct 2003 03:28:53 -0500 From: Marc-Christian Petersen Organization: Working Overloaded Linux Kernel To: Holger Schurig , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: status of ipchains in 2.6? Date: Tue, 28 Oct 2003 09:28:45 +0100 User-Agent: KMail/1.5.4 References: <200310280127.h9S1RM5d002140@napali.hpl.hp.com> In-Reply-To: X-Operating-System: Linux 2.4.20-wolk4.10s i686 GNU/Linux MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200310280928.45287.m.c.p@wolk-project.de> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tuesday 28 October 2003 09:23, Holger Schurig wrote: Hi Holger, > > Unlike ipchains, iptables works perfectly fine, so perhaps we just > > need to update Kconfig to discourage ipchains on ia64 (and/or other > > 64-bit platforms)? > Perhaps we simply drop ipchains support for good? NO! ciao, Marc