From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S261563AbTJ2VDi (ORCPT ); Wed, 29 Oct 2003 16:03:38 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S261585AbTJ2VDi (ORCPT ); Wed, 29 Oct 2003 16:03:38 -0500 Received: from mail-4.tiscali.it ([195.130.225.150]:2480 "EHLO mail-4.tiscali.it") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S261563AbTJ2VDh (ORCPT ); Wed, 29 Oct 2003 16:03:37 -0500 Date: Wed, 29 Oct 2003 22:03:21 +0100 From: Kronos To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Cc: "Kristofer T. Karas" , "Javier Villavicencio" Subject: Re: RadeonFB [Re: 2.4.23pre8 - ACPI Kernel Panic on boot] Message-ID: <20031029210321.GA11437@dreamland.darkstar.lan> Reply-To: kronos@kronoz.cjb.net Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <3FA01DB6.6080106@enterprise.bidmc.harvard.edu> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org > I guess the newer 0.1.8 is needed to support Radeon 9600's. I'm curious > as to whether other people have the same massive screen corruption > problems returning from X as I do. If not, probably best to keep the > new driver. (Maybe I should go out and buy myself a new Radeon. :-) I > have been using ATI's private DRI/DRM kernel module driver (fglrx) in > concert with XFree 4.2.0 for quite some time. Ah! ATI's driver touches registers behind our back. Can you reproduce without this binary module? Luca -- Reply-To: kronos@kronoz.cjb.net Home: http://kronoz.cjb.net Al termine di un pranzo di nozze mi hanno dato un amaro alle erbe cosi' schifoso che perfino sull'etichetta c'era un frate che vomitava.