From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S263667AbTKFP6S (ORCPT ); Thu, 6 Nov 2003 10:58:18 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S263675AbTKFP6R (ORCPT ); Thu, 6 Nov 2003 10:58:17 -0500 Received: from parcelfarce.linux.theplanet.co.uk ([195.92.249.252]:43987 "EHLO www.linux.org.uk") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S263667AbTKFP6R (ORCPT ); Thu, 6 Nov 2003 10:58:17 -0500 Date: Thu, 6 Nov 2003 15:58:15 +0000 From: viro@parcelfarce.linux.theplanet.co.uk To: Marcel Lanz Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: load 2.4.x binary only module on 2.6 Message-ID: <20031106155815.GQ7665@parcelfarce.linux.theplanet.co.uk> References: <20031106153004.GA30008@ds9.ch> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20031106153004.GA30008@ds9.ch> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, Nov 06, 2003 at 04:30:04PM +0100, Marcel Lanz wrote: > I have a binary only module for 2.4.x. > How much work is it to write a kind of wrapper to load an "old" module > on 2.6 ? Unfeasible.