From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S261850AbTKHRI5 (ORCPT ); Sat, 8 Nov 2003 12:08:57 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S261868AbTKHRI4 (ORCPT ); Sat, 8 Nov 2003 12:08:56 -0500 Received: from hermine.idb.hist.no ([158.38.50.15]:59915 "HELO hermine.idb.hist.no") by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id S261850AbTKHRIz (ORCPT ); Sat, 8 Nov 2003 12:08:55 -0500 Date: Sat, 8 Nov 2003 18:18:58 +0100 To: Rob Landley Cc: Maciej Soltysiak , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: 2.6: value 0x37ffffff truncated to 0x37ffffff Message-ID: <20031108171858.GA6489@hh.idb.hist.no> References: <200311080142.45003.rob@landley.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200311080142.45003.rob@landley.net> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.4i From: Helge Hafting Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Sat, Nov 08, 2003 at 01:42:44AM -0600, Rob Landley wrote: > On Friday 07 November 2003 09:36, Maciej Soltysiak wrote: > > arch/i386/boot/setup.S:165: Warning: value 0x37ffffff truncated to > > 0x37ffffff LD arch/i386/boot/setup > > What version of the tools you're using to compile it, maybe? (Distro, gcc > version, binutils version, etc... And if it's a non-intel system or > cross-compiling or something, that might be good to mention too...) > I have seen this for along time with debian testing, on intel. I use gcc 3.3.2, binutils: 2.14.90.0.6-5 I had the impressien that it doesn't matter, because it is truncated to the same value. I.e. no change, only a strange message? Helge Hafting