From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S262331AbTKVPri (ORCPT ); Sat, 22 Nov 2003 10:47:38 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S262353AbTKVPri (ORCPT ); Sat, 22 Nov 2003 10:47:38 -0500 Received: from willy.net1.nerim.net ([62.212.114.60]:25102 "EHLO w.ods.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S262331AbTKVPrh (ORCPT ); Sat, 22 Nov 2003 10:47:37 -0500 Date: Sat, 22 Nov 2003 16:47:20 +0100 From: Willy Tarreau To: Jean Delvare Cc: Marcelo Tosatti , LKML , LM Sensors , Greg KH Subject: Re: [PATCH 2.4] Trivial changes to I2C stuff Message-ID: <20031122154720.GA18110@alpha.home.local> References: <20031122161510.7d5b4d20.khali@linux-fr.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20031122161510.7d5b4d20.khali@linux-fr.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hi ! On Sat, Nov 22, 2003 at 04:15:10PM +0100, Jean Delvare wrote: > The changes are only white space and comment changes, and line reordering. <...> > @@ -199,7 +199,7 @@ > #define I2C_HW_SMBUS_AMD756 0x05 > #define I2C_HW_SMBUS_SIS5595 0x06 > #define I2C_HW_SMBUS_ALI1535 0x07 > -#define I2C_HW_SMBUS_W9968CF 0x08 > +#define I2C_HW_SMBUS_W9968CF 0x0d Is this one intentionnal or just a typo ? Cheers, Willy