From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner+willy=40w.ods.org@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
	id S264405AbTLEWXt (ORCPT <rfc822;willy@w.ods.org>);
	Fri, 5 Dec 2003 17:23:49 -0500
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S264463AbTLEWXt
	(ORCPT <rfc822;linux-kernel-outgoing>);
	Fri, 5 Dec 2003 17:23:49 -0500
Received: from mta4.rcsntx.swbell.net ([151.164.30.28]:26508 "EHLO
	mta4.rcsntx.swbell.net") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP
	id S264405AbTLEWXs (ORCPT <rfc822;linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>);
	Fri, 5 Dec 2003 17:23:48 -0500
Date: Fri, 5 Dec 2003 14:23:37 -0800
From: Mike Fedyk <mfedyk@matchmail.com>
To: John Jasen <jjasen@realityfailure.org>
Cc: Jan Rychter <jan@rychter.com>, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Linux 2.4 future
Message-ID: <20031205222337.GP29119@mis-mike-wstn.matchmail.com>
Mail-Followup-To: John Jasen <jjasen@realityfailure.org>,
	Jan Rychter <jan@rychter.com>, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
References: <m2k75dzj6n.fsf@tnuctip.rychter.com> <Pine.LNX.4.44.0312051021300.1469-100000@bushido>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.44.0312051021300.1469-100000@bushido>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.4i
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

On Fri, Dec 05, 2003 at 10:33:32AM -0500, John Jasen wrote:
> I would also claim that 2.4 wasn't useful until 2.4.10.

Make that 2.4.13, 2.4.10 had a partial merge of the new -aa VM, and it had
many bugs at the time.

Though, many people patched in the fixes instead of going with newer versions.