From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S264394AbTLEWUS (ORCPT ); Fri, 5 Dec 2003 17:20:18 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S264396AbTLEWUR (ORCPT ); Fri, 5 Dec 2003 17:20:17 -0500 Received: from rcpt-expgw.biglobe.ne.jp ([202.225.89.191]:9387 "EHLO rcpt-expgw.biglobe.ne.jp") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S264394AbTLEWUO (ORCPT ); Fri, 5 Dec 2003 17:20:14 -0500 X-Biglobe-Sender: Date: Sat, 06 Dec 2003 07:20:09 +0900 From: Stephen Lee To: "David S. Miller" Subject: Re: Extremely slow network with e1000 & ip_conntrack Cc: Stephen Lee , scott.feldman@intel.com, laforge@netfilter.org, netfilter-devel@lists.netfilter.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org In-Reply-To: <20031205122819.25ac14ab.davem@redhat.com> References: <20031204213030.2B75.MUKANSAI@emailplus.org> <20031205122819.25ac14ab.davem@redhat.com> Message-Id: <20031206071129.D31D.MUKANSAI@emailplus.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Becky! ver. 2.05.11 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org "David S. Miller" wrote: > > OK, I've found out what IP conntack does that creates the problems. > [...] > People can confirm this analysis by applying the patch below, enabling > TSO with conntrack loaded, and see if the problem goes away. I tested it with both e1000 & tg3, TSO on, and it is working fine for me using ftp and scp. Thanks, Stephen