From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S265112AbTLFLkk (ORCPT ); Sat, 6 Dec 2003 06:40:40 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S265119AbTLFLkk (ORCPT ); Sat, 6 Dec 2003 06:40:40 -0500 Received: from pa208.myslowice.sdi.tpnet.pl ([213.76.228.208]:748 "EHLO finwe.eu.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S265112AbTLFLkd (ORCPT ); Sat, 6 Dec 2003 06:40:33 -0500 Date: Sat, 6 Dec 2003 12:40:42 +0100 From: Jacek Kawa To: Jens Benecke Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: Help: 2.4 -> 2.6 (test11,bk2) kernel module file size (due to debug options?) Message-ID: <20031206114042.GA13349@finwe.eu.org> Mail-Followup-To: Jens Benecke , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Organization: Kreatorzy Kreacji Bialej User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.4i Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Jens Benecke wrote: > after installing (actually - creating a debian package for) 2.6.0-test11-bk2 > I have this: > 2.3M /boot > 366M /lib/modules/2.6.0-test11-bk2 !!! > 15k /usr/share/doc/kernel-image-2.6.0-test11-bk2 > > Almost all .ko files are >200k in size. What kernel setting is/can be > responsible for this? IIRC CONFIG_DEBUG_INFO [...] > .config attached. Not here... bye -- Jacek Kawa **Trust practically no-one... Except trustworthy people.** ['Jingo']