From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S265424AbTLHPiB (ORCPT ); Mon, 8 Dec 2003 10:38:01 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S265440AbTLHPiA (ORCPT ); Mon, 8 Dec 2003 10:38:00 -0500 Received: from host213-160-108-25.dsl.vispa.com ([213.160.108.25]:26563 "HELO cenedra.office") by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id S265424AbTLHPh6 (ORCPT ); Mon, 8 Dec 2003 10:37:58 -0500 From: Andrew Walrond To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: State of devfs in 2.6? Date: Mon, 8 Dec 2003 15:36:26 +0000 User-Agent: KMail/1.5.4 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200312081536.26022.andrew@walrond.org> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Whats the general feeling about devfs now? I remember Christoph and others making some nasty remarks about it 6months ago or so, but later noted christoph doing some slashing and burning thereof. Is it 'nice' yet? Andrew Walrond