From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S266067AbTLISx5 (ORCPT ); Tue, 9 Dec 2003 13:53:57 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S266069AbTLISx5 (ORCPT ); Tue, 9 Dec 2003 13:53:57 -0500 Received: from fw.osdl.org ([65.172.181.6]:50098 "EHLO mail.osdl.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S266067AbTLISxv (ORCPT ); Tue, 9 Dec 2003 13:53:51 -0500 Date: Tue, 9 Dec 2003 10:53:15 -0800 From: cliff white To: Larry McVoy Cc: lm@bitmover.com, hannal@us.ibm.com, lse-tech@lists.sourceforge.net, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [Lse-tech] Re: Minutes from OSDL talk at LSE call today Message-Id: <20031209105315.6a2b4ab7.cliffw@osdl.org> In-Reply-To: <20031204234454.GA15799@work.bitmover.com> References: <189470000.1070500829@w-hlinder> <20031204033535.GA2370@work.bitmover.com> <20031204134517.0c7a4ec4.cliffw@osdl.org> <20031204234454.GA15799@work.bitmover.com> Organization: OSDL X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 0.9.6 (GTK+ 1.2.9; i686-pc-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, 4 Dec 2003 15:44:54 -0800 Larry McVoy wrote: > On Thu, Dec 04, 2003 at 01:45:17PM -0800, cliff white wrote: > > On Wed, 3 Dec 2003 19:35:35 -0800 > > Larry McVoy wrote: > > > > > On Wed, Dec 03, 2003 at 05:20:29PM -0800, Hanna Linder wrote: > > > > The Mozilla Tinderbox is based on CVS and can do fancy things with > > > > triggers. The kernel one is not as fancy because they are still > > > > working out issues with BK. > > > > > > If we could get a list of these issues we'll try and see what we can do > > > to help. My response has been a bit spotty lately, I've needed to take > > > some personal time, so pinging support@bitmover.com is more likely to > > > get you help. > > > > We've exchanged some email with support@bitmover.com, and they've been > > a great help. Really, there are two things. > > > > The first is triggers. The Mozilla tinderbox is driven by triggers from > > CVS commits. I believe that triggers are resevered for the commercial > > version of BK. > > That's not true. Trigger support is identical in both versions. > > > However, unlike CVS, BK has a nice way of asking the remote repository > > if new changes exist, so we really don't need a trigger to tell us when > > to start a build. > > Right. Your problem is deciding which trees you want to track. There is > Linus/Marcelo trees but there are probably another 200+ trees of the kernel > on bkbits.net and who knows how many elsewhere (we've counted over 10,000 > before we stopped counting). Obviously you don't want to track all of those > but some of them might be interesting. > > > The main issue here is finding the proper syntax for the bkweb url so > > we get all of the changesets included in the commit. We've recieved a > > few examples from your support people, and we're using one currently. > > So are there any open issues? The call implied there were. I don't think there are any open issues for BK. The tinderbox crew still has some work to do. cliffw > -- > --- > Larry McVoy lm at bitmover.com http://www.bitmover.com/lm > -- The church is near, but the road is icy. The bar is far, but i will walk carefully. - Russian proverb