From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S263692AbTLOOxf (ORCPT ); Mon, 15 Dec 2003 09:53:35 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S263702AbTLOOxf (ORCPT ); Mon, 15 Dec 2003 09:53:35 -0500 Received: from mion.elka.pw.edu.pl ([194.29.160.35]:40907 "EHLO mion.elka.pw.edu.pl") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S263692AbTLOOxe (ORCPT ); Mon, 15 Dec 2003 09:53:34 -0500 From: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz To: Bob Subject: Re: IRQ disabled (SATA) on NForce2 and my theory Date: Mon, 15 Dec 2003 15:55:51 +0100 User-Agent: KMail/1.5.4 References: <3FDD4F7C.7090303@nishanet.com> In-Reply-To: <3FDD4F7C.7090303@nishanet.com> Cc: linux-kernel MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-2" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200312151555.51845.bzolnier@elka.pw.edu.pl> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Monday 15 of December 2003 07:06, Bob wrote: > sii chips have a long history of needing to > hdparm off the unmask interrupt feature. > > I don't know about that chip but for > sii680 there is a special option "-p9" > for hdparm which is to say pio mode 9 > is a special instruction in addition to > standard hdparm opt "-u0" turning off > irq unmask. There is no such thing as 'special option "-p9"' for sii680. > /sbin/hdparm -d1 -c1 -p9 -X70 -u0 -k0 -i $a -X70 is only valid if your device is UDMA133. --bart