From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S262859AbTLPVyQ (ORCPT ); Tue, 16 Dec 2003 16:54:16 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S262901AbTLPVyQ (ORCPT ); Tue, 16 Dec 2003 16:54:16 -0500 Received: from fw.osdl.org ([65.172.181.6]:9925 "EHLO mail.osdl.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S262859AbTLPVyO (ORCPT ); Tue, 16 Dec 2003 16:54:14 -0500 Date: Tue, 16 Dec 2003 13:55:06 -0800 From: Andrew Morton To: Paul Jackson Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] > 256 CPU cpumask build fix - const confusion Message-Id: <20031216135506.354231d7.akpm@osdl.org> In-Reply-To: <20031216125229.14871a4e.pj@sgi.com> References: <20031216125229.14871a4e.pj@sgi.com> X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 0.9.7 (GTK+ 1.2.10; i586-pc-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Paul Jackson wrote: > > Could you please apply the following patch. It is needed > to build kernels with > 256 CPUs. I already have, but the -mm flow has been sluggish lately. I'll try to get test11-mm1 out tonight. It looks like it'll hit 300 patches :(