From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S264409AbTLQLwS (ORCPT ); Wed, 17 Dec 2003 06:52:18 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S264414AbTLQLwS (ORCPT ); Wed, 17 Dec 2003 06:52:18 -0500 Received: from fw.osdl.org ([65.172.181.6]:25035 "EHLO mail.osdl.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S264409AbTLQLwQ (ORCPT ); Wed, 17 Dec 2003 06:52:16 -0500 Date: Wed, 17 Dec 2003 03:51:05 -0800 From: Andrew Morton To: Christian Axelsson Cc: andrew@walrond.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: 2.6.0-test11-mm1 Message-Id: <20031217035105.3c0bd533.akpm@osdl.org> In-Reply-To: <3FE039F5.5030703@lanil.mine.nu> References: <20031217014350.028460b2.akpm@osdl.org> <200312171037.16969.andrew@walrond.org> <3FE039F5.5030703@lanil.mine.nu> X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 0.9.4 (GTK+ 1.2.10; i686-pc-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Christian Axelsson wrote: > > Andrew Walrond wrote: > > On Wednesday 17 Dec 2003 9:43 am, Andrew Morton wrote: > > > What are your intentions with -mm when you take over 2.6? Is any of -mm > > getting into 2.6 before 2.6.0 release? Is it mainly queued for 2.6.1? We'll start merging it up after 2.6.0. It'll be quite a lot of work, actually - a lot of things have been parked in -mm for some time and may not have had sufficiently wide testing, especially on non-i386. I need to ask the originators and others to re-review and retest some things. > I would like to know aswell :) > Will you be "bleeding edge" maintainer aswell or will that be handed > over to someone else? I guess I'll keep -mm going until there's a reason not to.