mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Richard Curnow <Richard.Curnow@superh.com>
To: David Brownell <dbrownell@users.sourceforge.net>,
	Greg KH <greg@kroah.com>
Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Handling of bounce buffers by rh_call_control
Date: Wed, 17 Dec 2003 11:41:25 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20031217114125.GA20057@malvern.uk.w2k.superh.com> (raw)

The following patch

===== drivers/usb/hcd.c 1.10 vs edited =====
--- 1.10/drivers/usb/hcd.c      Mon Mar 31 14:22:42 2003
+++ edited/drivers/usb/hcd.c    Wed Dec 17 11:26:53 2003
@@ -323,7 +323,7 @@
        struct usb_ctrlrequest *cmd = (struct usb_ctrlrequest *) urb->setup_packet;
        u16             typeReq, wValue, wIndex, wLength;
        const u8        *bufp = 0;
-       u8              *ubuf = urb->transfer_buffer;
+       u8              *ubuf = (u8 *) urb->transfer_dma;
        int             len = 0;
 
        typeReq  = (cmd->bRequestType << 8) | cmd->bRequest;

seems to be needed to make the following code later in the function work

	if (bufp) {
		if (urb->transfer_buffer_length < len)
			len = urb->transfer_buffer_length;
		urb->actual_length = len;
		// always USB_DIR_IN, toward host
		memcpy (ubuf, bufp, len);
	}

in the case where bounce buffers are being used to implement PCI DMA
operations.  Without the patch, the subsequent pci_unmap_single copies
the contents of the bounce buffer over the top of urb->transfer_buffer,
destroying what the memcpy() put there.

My USB knowledge is pretty limited, so I've no idea whether this patch
adversely affects anything else in rh_call_control.

The patch is against 2.4.23-pre-something, but I see the code's the same
in 2.6.

-- 
Richard \\\ SH-4/SH-5 Core & Debug Architect
Curnow  \\\         SuperH (UK) Ltd, Bristol

             reply	other threads:[~2003-12-17 11:41 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2003-12-17 11:41 Richard Curnow [this message]
2003-12-17 16:29 ` David Brownell
2003-12-17 22:47   ` bill davidsen
     [not found]   ` <200312172247.RAA08325@gatekeeper.tmr.com>
2003-12-18  2:40     ` David Brownell
2003-12-18 14:32   ` Richard Curnow
2003-12-18 14:53     ` iproute2 and 2.6.0 kernel Remus
2003-12-22 19:07       ` bill davidsen
2003-12-30 11:31       ` Remus
2003-12-18 15:36     ` Handling of bounce buffers by rh_call_control David Brownell

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20031217114125.GA20057@malvern.uk.w2k.superh.com \
    --to=richard.curnow@superh.com \
    --cc=dbrownell@users.sourceforge.net \
    --cc=greg@kroah.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®