From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner+willy=40w.ods.org@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
	id S265229AbTLRQfi (ORCPT <rfc822;willy@w.ods.org>);
	Thu, 18 Dec 2003 11:35:38 -0500
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S265228AbTLRQfi
	(ORCPT <rfc822;linux-kernel-outgoing>);
	Thu, 18 Dec 2003 11:35:38 -0500
Received: from proxy.ovh.net ([213.244.20.42]:19475 "EHLO proxy.ovh.net")
	by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S265239AbTLRQfa (ORCPT
	<rfc822;linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>);
	Thu, 18 Dec 2003 11:35:30 -0500
Date: Thu, 18 Dec 2003 17:35:28 +0100
From: Miroslaw KLABA <totoro@totoro.be>
To: Zwane Mwaikambo <zwane@arm.linux.org.uk>
Cc: john stultz <johnstul@us.ibm.com>, lkml <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Double Interrupt with HT
Message-Id: <20031218173528.370211b6.totoro@totoro.be>
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.58.0312180849480.1710@montezuma.fsmlabs.com>
References: <20031215155843.210107b6.totoro@totoro.be>
	<1071603069.991.194.camel@cog.beaverton.ibm.com>
	<1071615336.3fdf8d6840208@ssl0.ovh.net>
	<1071618630.1013.11.camel@cog.beaverton.ibm.com>
	<1071630228.3fdfc794eb353@ssl0.ovh.net>
	<1071717730.1117.26.camel@cog.beaverton.ibm.com>
	<20031218131437.239e69e5.totoro@totoro.be>
	<Pine.LNX.4.58.0312180849480.1710@montezuma.fsmlabs.com>
Organization: Ovh
X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 0.9.7 (GTK+ 1.2.10; i386-pc-linux-gnu)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

My fault...
It works now.
`while true; do date; sleep 1; done` counts well now.
Thanks.
But now, how may I help to find this bug in apic code?

Miro

# cat /proc/interrupts 
           CPU0       CPU1       
  0:      12421          0          XT-PIC  timer
  1:          2          0          XT-PIC  keyboard
  2:          0          0          XT-PIC  cascade
  4:         16          0          XT-PIC  serial
  8:          1          0          XT-PIC  rtc
 11:        642          0          XT-PIC  eth0
 14:       2865          0          XT-PIC  ide0
NMI:          0          0 
LOC:      12355      12353 
ERR:          0
MIS:          0



On Thu, 18 Dec 2003 08:51:06 -0500 (EST)
Zwane Mwaikambo <zwane@arm.linux.org.uk> wrote:

> On Thu, 18 Dec 2003, Miroslaw KLABA wrote:
> 
> > > Does booting w/ "noapic" help?
> > No, I still have the time that is going twice the speed.
> > I included /proc/interrupts, dmesg and lspci. It's with the 2.4.23 kernel without the irq_balance patch.
> > Hope this help.
> >
> > # cat /proc/interrupts
> >            CPU0       CPU1
> >   0:      71181      71121    IO-APIC-edge  timer
> >   1:          2          2    IO-APIC-edge  keyboard
> >   2:          0          0          XT-PIC  cascade
> >   4:         16         16    IO-APIC-edge  serial
> >   8:          1          1    IO-APIC-edge  rtc
> >  14:       3294       3295    IO-APIC-edge  ide0
> >  23:       2334       2339   IO-APIC-level  eth0
> > NMI:          0          0
> > LOC:      71109      71108
> > ERR:          0
> > MIS:          0
> >
> > Kernel command line: auto BOOT_IMAGE=linux-bi ro root=301 BOOT_FILE=/boot/bzImage-2.4.23-bipiv noacpi
> 
> John meant 'noapic' not 'noacpi', you'll note that the interrupt
> controller types after boot will be XT-PIC instead of say IO-APIC-edge
> etc..