From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S265253AbTLRTVh (ORCPT ); Thu, 18 Dec 2003 14:21:37 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S265265AbTLRTVh (ORCPT ); Thu, 18 Dec 2003 14:21:37 -0500 Received: from host213-160-108-25.dsl.vispa.com ([213.160.108.25]:5332 "HELO cenedra.office") by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id S265253AbTLRTVg (ORCPT ); Thu, 18 Dec 2003 14:21:36 -0500 From: Andrew Walrond To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: Can't wait for '2.8 or 3.0',or maybe: 2.8 followed by 2.10 ?? Date: Thu, 18 Dec 2003 19:21:34 +0000 User-Agent: KMail/1.5.4 References: <20031218170628.GA3129@localhost.localdomain> <1071765527.12681.5.camel@clubneon.priv.hereintown.net> In-Reply-To: <1071765527.12681.5.camel@clubneon.priv.hereintown.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200312181921.34648.andrew@walrond.org> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thursday 18 Dec 2003 4:38 pm, Chris Meadors wrote: > > The names could be chosen alphabetically. Rooster was mentioned for > 2.7, but since 2.6 is beaver, I propose cock, as 'c' follows 'b'. Being more than happy with beaver, I don't think I'd getting involved with de- bugging cock. I'd probably wait until Tit is released. I've always been fond of tits.