From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S262195AbTLSJnK (ORCPT ); Fri, 19 Dec 2003 04:43:10 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S262280AbTLSJnJ (ORCPT ); Fri, 19 Dec 2003 04:43:09 -0500 Received: from mail.fh-wedel.de ([213.39.232.194]:60559 "EHLO mail.fh-wedel.de") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S262195AbTLSJmq (ORCPT ); Fri, 19 Dec 2003 04:42:46 -0500 Date: Fri, 19 Dec 2003 10:41:23 +0100 From: =?iso-8859-1?Q?J=F6rn?= Engel To: Karim Yaghmour Cc: Nick Piggin , Zwane Mwaikambo , Andrew Morton , Linus Torvalds , linux-kernel Subject: Re: [PATCH] Updating real-time and nanokernel maintainers Message-ID: <20031219094122.GA23469@wohnheim.fh-wedel.de> References: <3FE234E4.8020500@opersys.com> <3FE23966.7060001@opersys.com> <3FE23CD1.4080802@opersys.com> <3FE23E3F.2000801@cyberone.com.au> <3FE2424B.70901@opersys.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: <3FE2424B.70901@opersys.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.28i Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, 18 December 2003 19:11:55 -0500, Karim Yaghmour wrote: > Nick Piggin wrote: > > >As Zwane said, neither have code in the kernel, so I don't see how > >you think it is justified...? > > It is justified in the same way that the RTLinux entry was justified > for those many years. Which is another way of saying not at all. Unless the file is renamed to NEAT_PROJECTS, take out any non-maintainers. Jörn -- Victory in war is not repetitious. -- Sun Tzu