From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S261731AbTLTWUi (ORCPT ); Sat, 20 Dec 2003 17:20:38 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S261735AbTLTWUi (ORCPT ); Sat, 20 Dec 2003 17:20:38 -0500 Received: from krusty.dt.E-Technik.Uni-Dortmund.DE ([129.217.163.1]:43181 "EHLO mail.dt.e-technik.uni-dortmund.de") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S261731AbTLTWUh (ORCPT ); Sat, 20 Dec 2003 17:20:37 -0500 Date: Sat, 20 Dec 2003 23:20:34 +0100 From: Matthias Andree To: linux kernel mailing list Subject: Re: 2.6 vs 2.4 regression when running gnomemeeting Message-ID: <20031220222034.GA2040@merlin.emma.line.org> Mail-Followup-To: linux kernel mailing list References: <1071864709.1044.172.camel@localhost> <1071885178.1044.227.camel@localhost> <3FE3B61C.4070204@cyberone.com.au> <200312201355.08116.kernel@kolivas.org> <1071891168.1044.256.camel@localhost> <3FE3C6FC.7050401@cyberone.com.au> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <3FE3C6FC.7050401@cyberone.com.au> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.5.1i Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Sat, 20 Dec 2003, Nick Piggin wrote: > >/dev/hda: > >multcount = 0 (off) > >IO_support = 0 (default 16-bit) > >unmaskirq = 0 (off) > >using_dma = 1 (on) > >keepsettings = 0 (off) > >readonly = 0 (off) > >readahead = 256 (on) > >geometry = 65535/16/63, sectors = 117210240, start = 0 > > > > This might be a problem - try turning unmaskirq on, and possibly > 32-bit IO support on (hdparm -u1 -c1 /dev/hda). I think there is > a remote possibility that doing this will corrupt your data just Does 32-bit I/O support make a difference for DMA transfers at all or just for PIO? -- Matthias Andree Encrypt your mail: my GnuPG key ID is 0x052E7D95