From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S264923AbTLWAs4 (ORCPT ); Mon, 22 Dec 2003 19:48:56 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S264929AbTLWAs4 (ORCPT ); Mon, 22 Dec 2003 19:48:56 -0500 Received: from fw.osdl.org ([65.172.181.6]:21386 "EHLO mail.osdl.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S264923AbTLWAsz (ORCPT ); Mon, 22 Dec 2003 19:48:55 -0500 Date: Mon, 22 Dec 2003 16:49:46 -0800 From: Andrew Morton To: corbet@lwn.net (Jonathan Corbet) Cc: anton@samba.org, mh@nadir.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] seq_file version of /proc/interrupts Message-Id: <20031222164946.61644783.akpm@osdl.org> In-Reply-To: <20031223003831.25486.qmail@lwn.net> References: <20031223002217.GC934@krispykreme> <20031223003831.25486.qmail@lwn.net> X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 0.9.7 (GTK+ 1.2.10; i586-pc-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org corbet@lwn.net (Jonathan Corbet) wrote: > > > - int i, j; > > + int i = *(int *) v, j; > > > That int * has to be a loff_t * or bad things will happen on a 64bit big > > endian platform :) > > You mean the world's not all an x86? What are things coming to? > > Andrew, Marc, this seems almost certain to the the source of the problem > you brought to my attention. I'll try to get a supplemental patch to you > tomorrow. Obviously, it should be a loff_t for all architectures, even if > it works for most now. hmm, I seem to have already fixed pppc64. I'll fix up the other architectures.