From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S265061AbTLWJGz (ORCPT ); Tue, 23 Dec 2003 04:06:55 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S265063AbTLWJGz (ORCPT ); Tue, 23 Dec 2003 04:06:55 -0500 Received: from phoenix.infradead.org ([213.86.99.234]:23822 "EHLO phoenix.infradead.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S265061AbTLWJGy (ORCPT ); Tue, 23 Dec 2003 04:06:54 -0500 Date: Tue, 23 Dec 2003 09:02:27 +0000 From: Christoph Hellwig To: Pat Gefre Cc: akpm@osdl.org, davidm@napali.hpl.hp.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] Updating our sn code in 2.6 Message-ID: <20031223090227.A5027@infradead.org> Mail-Followup-To: Christoph Hellwig , Pat Gefre , akpm@osdl.org, davidm@napali.hpl.hp.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org References: <20031220122749.A5223@infradead.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5.1i In-Reply-To: ; from pfg@sgi.com on Mon, Dec 22, 2003 at 08:55:10PM -0600 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, Dec 22, 2003 at 08:55:10PM -0600, Pat Gefre wrote: > + Well, the pci-reorg patch is just wrong with tht remaining stuff > + and breaks the portable I/O code for IP27 and SN2 I'm working on. > > I have not heard any compelling reasons for keeping non-ia64, non-Altix > code in the ia64, Altix code base. The code re-org is aimed towards a > new ASIC we are working on - we feel it is needed. Again, you can reorganize code as much as you want. Just don't change macro names randomly. And the reason is once again that there will be a code drop supporting SN2 and IP27 in the same codebase soon, going the usual linux way of architecture-independant drivers for common hardware. > + issues before merging, it's not that much anyway.. > > I think I did. I sent another email with the changes I made for the > issues you raised - and updated the patches. If I missed any, please > let me know. Ok, I haven't looked at that yet. > David or Andrew can you take these patches ? Please backpourt the renaming first.