From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S261881AbTL1SE1 (ORCPT ); Sun, 28 Dec 2003 13:04:27 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S261893AbTL1SE1 (ORCPT ); Sun, 28 Dec 2003 13:04:27 -0500 Received: from mail-infomine.ucr.edu ([138.23.89.48]:34744 "EHLO mail-infomine.ucr.edu") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S261881AbTL1SE0 (ORCPT ); Sun, 28 Dec 2003 13:04:26 -0500 Date: Sun, 28 Dec 2003 10:04:24 -0800 To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Best Low-cost IDE RAID Solution For 2.6.x? (OT?) Message-ID: <20031228180424.GA16622@mail-infomine.ucr.edu> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.28i X-Fnord: +++ath X-WebTV-Stationery: Standard; BGColor=black; TextColor=black X-Message-Flag: Message text blocked: ADULT LANGUAGE/SITUATIONS X-BeenThere: crackmonkey@crackmonkey.org From: ruschein@mail-infomine.ucr.edu (Johannes Ruscheinski) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hi, We're looking for a low-cost high-reliability IDE RAID solution that works well with the 2.6.x series of kernels. We have about 1 TB (8 disks) that we'd like to access in a non-redundant raid mode. Yes, I know, that lack of redundancy and high reliability are contradictory. Let's just say that currently we lack the funding to do anything else but we may be able to obtain more funding for our disk storage needs in the near future. -- TIA, Johannes -- Dr. Johannes Ruscheinski EMail: ruschein_AT_infomine.ucr.edu *** Linux *** Location: science library, room G40 *** The Choice Of A GNU Generation! *** Phone: (909) 787-2279 Outlook, n.: A virus delivery system with added email functionality.