From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S264446AbTL3GST (ORCPT ); Tue, 30 Dec 2003 01:18:19 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S264450AbTL3GSS (ORCPT ); Tue, 30 Dec 2003 01:18:18 -0500 Received: from pizda.ninka.net ([216.101.162.242]:11979 "EHLO pizda.ninka.net") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S264446AbTL3GSP (ORCPT ); Tue, 30 Dec 2003 01:18:15 -0500 Date: Mon, 29 Dec 2003 22:13:45 -0800 From: "David S. Miller" To: Jeff Garzik Cc: benh@kernel.crashing.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: Problem with dev_kfree_skb_any() in 2.6.0 Message-Id: <20031229221345.31c8c763.davem@redhat.com> In-Reply-To: <3FF11745.4060705@pobox.com> References: <1072567054.4112.14.camel@gaston> <20031227170755.4990419b.davem@redhat.com> <3FF0FA6A.8000904@pobox.com> <20031229205157.4c631f28.davem@redhat.com> <20031230051519.GA6916@gtf.org> <20031229220122.30078657.davem@redhat.com> <3FF11745.4060705@pobox.com> X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 0.9.7 (GTK+ 1.2.6; sparc-unknown-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, 30 Dec 2003 01:12:21 -0500 Jeff Garzik wrote: > Think about the name of this function: dev_kfree_skb_any() > > If this function cannot be used -anywhere-, then the concept (and the > net stack) is fundamentally broken for this function. We must _remove_ > the function, and thus _I_ have a lot of driver work to do. If it makes you happy, change the suffix of the name, I am not emotionally attached to the name.