From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S261744AbTL3JZs (ORCPT ); Tue, 30 Dec 2003 04:25:48 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S265702AbTL3JZs (ORCPT ); Tue, 30 Dec 2003 04:25:48 -0500 Received: from [62.116.46.196] ([62.116.46.196]:55821 "EHLO it-loops.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S261744AbTL3JZr (ORCPT ); Tue, 30 Dec 2003 04:25:47 -0500 Date: Tue, 30 Dec 2003 10:25:20 +0100 From: Michael Guntsche To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: Network problems with b44 in 2.6.0 Message-Id: <20031230102520.173501ec.mike@it-loops.com> X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 0.9.7 (GTK+ 1.2.10; i386-pc-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org I did some more tests and found out that disabling ACPI support with acpi=off gave me a functional card again. pci=noacpi wasn't enough. Someone knows how ACPI can interfere with the network in only one direction (receive)?. It would make more sense to me if the card didn't work at all. Michael